Sergey, how do you assess the performance of your department in the past year? As the financial crisis that began in the fourth quarter of last year, will affect the situation with disabilities in the public sector? Difficult to assess their own work, for the figures tell us. In 2008, the total number of inspections conducted by the service to nearly 40,000 (39,902), which is 5,000 more than the same period last year. Of these, more than 20,000, to be precise, the 20,224 - is verification of compliance with legislation in the fiscal area, the rest - verification of compliance with currency legislation. Since last year we went to a stable level of audits in the fiscal area of ??the order of 21-22 thousand checks. Growth performance this year due to increased number of inspections under the exchange control. The reason - a sharp increase in the amount of information from the Central Bank of Russia, show signs of violation of residents and foreign exchange legislation. Flux reaches an average of 200-250 thousand messages a month, and we, of course, respond. A key indicator of our work - the share of audited federal budget. Comparative analysis of the volume we examined the budget for the past four years showed a positive trend. Volume tested in 2008, the federal budget compared with 2005 increased by 165%. A sum of proven Rosfinnadzor federal budget, according to data reported each year has grown on average by 480 billion rubles. In 2008, the amount of proven resources amounted to 2 trillion 317 billion rubles. Of course, due to the sequestration of expenditure of the federal budget this year for future performance may vary. But the volume of checked our means, as we expect, was at the level of 32-33 percent. Every second our audit in fiscal sphere reveals a violation. In 2008 Rosfinnadzor revealed violations of financial and budget legislation in the expenditure of more than 514.5 billion rubles, including the expenditure of federal budget - more than 393 billion rubles, or 17 percent of the amount of proven resources of the federal budget. Compared with 2007, total federal budget, used with violations of legislation in the fiscal area, increased by 126.94 percent. Now about the financial crisis. It is in a crisis situation the financial authorities need to optimize budget spending, cut off the excess, including the focus on specific indicators of the volume of the violations for various destinations. Accordingly, Rosfinnadzor should work vigorously to ensure the financial authorities of such indicators. It is known that during a crisis, people get nervous and make mistakes, some of them may begin to live "the last day." We expect that the list of our clientele will expand. This could be an increase in the volume penetrated by us of violations by tens of percent. Not at times, but significantly. What kind of abuses by officials often fall on a pencil to your inspection? How much money can be returned to the budget? The most serious financial irregularities is inappropriate use of budget funds, for which legislation provides for the liability up to the criminal. In just the last year we found evidence of misuse of budget funds in the amount of 2 billion 170 million rubles. In 2008, the territorial administration sent 4,029 notices to reduce the limits of budget obligations chief administrators of the federal budget in the amount of misuse of funds in the amount of 884.66 million rubles (51.4 percent of the total misuse of the federal budget). In 6507 the police handed over the materials audits and detected violations in the amount of 305 billion rubles, or 146 per cent more than in 2007. Transferred materials on the law enforcement authorities filed 271 criminal charges of 1.498 billion rubles from the violations of the law in the fiscal area. As a result, 3,408 officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility, among them 109 dismissed, officials in 3299 imposed other disciplinary action. Go to the liability involved 1,108 people. In 2008, for violations of legislation in the fiscal area on the results of audits and inspections conducted Rosfinnadzor, convicted 74 people. In 2008, staff Rosfinnadzor on the facts of the identified misuse of the federal budget and state extra-budgetary funds amounting to 257.9 million rubles were 3077 protocols on administrative violations. In 2008, Rosfinnadzor filed 4125 cases on administrative violations in the amount of misuse of funds in the amount of 397.1 million rubles, including the decision to initiate proceedings on administrative violations received from the authorized bodies. Upon review of 3,033 cases of administrative violations in the amount of misuse of funds from the federal budget of $ 266.8 million rubles a ruling on imposition of administrative fines in the amount of 22.2 million rubles. As a result of the budget offset by 144 billion rubles, or 78 percent more than in 2007. With regard to exchange control, the following work in 2008 Rosfinnadzor filed 9550 cases of administrative violations and made 14 635 decisions on administrative punishment. State income recovered 402 million rubles in fines for violating currency laws of the Russian Federation acts and acts of foreign exchange regulation. Last year, the statistics Rosfinnadzor financial violations were leading the Ministry of Defense, Roskultura and Roszdrav. Are there any changes at the top "rating embezzlers" in figures this year? We are not talking about the ranking. Everything is much more complicated. In addition to the malice is such traditional factors as carelessness, chaos, lack of trained personnel and so on. The saddest thing is that all three offices mentioned improvements are not happening. For example, in Roskultura during a routine inspection revealed only a misuse of budget funds worth over 32 million rubles. Act on the results of this test is directed to the General Prosecutor of the Russian Federation. Let's see how the prosecutors will now act. In Minsotszdrave inspection revealed violations of the use of funds allocated in 2007 to implement the national project "Health" for a total of 6 billion 815 million rubles (including the federal budget - 6 billion 737 million rubles of federal budgetary funds 77,600,000 rubles). According to the Defense Ministry. In 2008, we conducted 1,900 monitoring events in this ministry. Diversion of expenditure is set in 547 military units in the amount of 546 million rubles. In this case, we note the efforts of the ministry to change he had inherited a complex system, but the resistance of human material yet still strong. Sergey, as you know, today in Russia there are no significant foreign exchange restrictions. The only limitation is possible, I think, to name only a requirement for repatriation. However, the requirement for mandatory sale of foreign exchange earnings are withdrawn. Question: How then provided the requirement for repatriation? and what are the most common currency violations identified Rosfinnadzor? This question requires an answer from the documents in hand. Let me you brought your own. Hence, as follows: January 1, 2007, amendments involving significant changes in the system of currency restrictions in force in the Russian Federation. In particular, in accordance with Federal Law of 10 December 2003 № 173-FZ "On Currency Regulation and Currency Control" no longer in force provisions previously established the following exchange restrictions: reserve requirement, the mandatory use of special accounts; requirement for mandatory sale of foreign exchange earnings in the domestic foreign exchange market, the requirement of prior registration with the tax authorities account (deposit), opened in banks outside the Russian Federation; requirement to enforce the obligations of non-residents to residents while carrying out currency transactions, requirements for transactions between residents and nonresidents of Operations with domestic and foreign securities. At the same time preserving and promoting the sustainability of the Russian economy, prevent and control crises, providing economic, financial security, determines the need for statutory requirements. These include: a ban on currency operations between residents, except those expressly specified in the law, the repatriation of foreign exchange and currency of the Russian Federation, owed the residents under the terms of trade agreements concluded with non-residents, the requirements for opening and maintaining accounts for abroad, reporting, responsibilities established by the Bank of Russia in accordance with Federal law "On Currency Regulation and Currency Control" on registration of passports of transactions and reporting to the bank confirming the transaction passport documents and so on. Ensuring proper monitoring of compliance with obligations of residents on repatriation is achieved through the effective organization of interaction with TCF, FTS of Russia, as well as with the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Rosfinnadzor receives information about the evidence of violation of residents and foreign exchange legislation and acts of foreign exchange regulation. The greatest share in the total detected violations of currency legislation acts of the Russian Federation and acts of exchange control violations are: procedures for the reporting and registration of passports of transactions in currency transactions - 67 percent of the total number of violations (Part 6 of Article 15.25 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation); non resident the due date for receipt of duties to their bank accounts at authorized banks, foreign exchange or currency of the Russian Federation, owed for delivered goods to non-residents carried out for non-resident work, services rendered by non-residents or nonresidents of the transmitted information or the results of intellectual activities, including exclusive rights to them - 14 percent of the total number of violations (Part 4 of Article 15.25 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation), 11 percent of the total number of violations necessary to carry out illegal foreign exchange transactions (part 1 of article 15.25 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation). On the rest of the article 15.25 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation accounted for less than 8 percent of the total number of violations. Everyone is saying that the crisis is most affected Russia. What it can say? And as the state of the Russian economy can affect the economy of Belarus and other neighboring countries? In what sense is the best? You wait six months and see for yourself. In regions of funds for capital repairs in the homes that need repair and related to the HOA, distributed under the paramount influence of urban administrations. Please specify in which public authorities seek to initiate audits of local administrations in charge of distribution of money for capital repairs in homes? Where free access is available with the documents governing: the procedure for allocation of funds for repairs, the procedure for financial settlements to allocate specific amounts on repairs? It matters to the state corporation - the Fund for Reforming public utilities. The law of this state-owned corporation (however, and others too) has been adopted in the version that prints money out of state corporation under the state financial control. Therefore, we have about them do not know. Probably, they have sites and reception. Hence, there and should be treated. What do you think, does it make sense to withdraw from the banks all of the profits derived from currency speculation by imposing a special tax and send the money to support the industry? We must, perhaps, to take away from citizens who have on hand and balances of foreign currency income in the form of foreign exchange, they received as a result of a planned devaluation. Probably, this money is still not enough, but try to always be, right? What's really only limited by banks ... Why not create an effective model for control of trafficking in the budget in the chain center (Moscow) - the end user? State institutions are not able to physically keep track of everything, and besides, there are cases of collusion between officials. I suggest that every day on the First Channel to declare how much money in any region and that has been sent. Declare the decision makers - Full name (mayor, governor, local MPs, etc.). Create a corresponding Internet site, where performers have to report on the work as detailed as possible. People directly living on-site finance itself will monitor and control the process. And in case of any suspicion, we can write or call the appropriate authorities. Here is what I call civil society - trust the authorities to the people. Ultimately, this should not the president, and ordinary citizens. I absolutely agree that all this should be first and foremost for citizens. Theoretically. Practically for me it is not obvious that "ordinary citizens" to those really interested. Nevertheless, the idea of ??agree. We, on the other hand, in this part are on the following plan. 1. In 2007 the place on the site overall plan audits and report on the overall results. Done. 2. In 2008, start posting service site list of planned audits. Done, you can see where all of our 20,000 inspections. 3. In 2009, start posting on the site reports on the largest, comprehensive inspections - about 70-80 checks. Do. 4. In 2010, start posting on the site reports for each check conducted by the service. Hopefully, we will do and it is. But none of it is ordinary citizens do not seem interested and do not need. Visits to the site in this section - one. But generally, yes, openness and transparency of public finances - a good thing. Do you have any feedback from your customers? How do people evaluate your work? Subject feedback we are very interested. Last year we commissioned a special study estimates and opinions of staff members, inspected Rosfinnadzor. The study was conducted in 40 cities and towns of 21 regions of Russia. Responding to questions from the interview, employees of budget organizations commented on the entourage of service, was assessed daily practice of its staff. The study confirmed the high reputation of our service: most of the negative myths specific to assess auditee against Rosfinnadzor have failed. However, the study recorded a number of negative factors associated primarily with the everyday working practices of staff working on the ground "- in regional offices. In everyday use the thesis that "the representatives of supervisory authorities are aggressive, pressure, abuse its administrative powers" in respect of employees Rosfinnadzor not confirmed. More than 60 percent of respondents characterized Rosfinnadzor staff as "confident," "competent," "organized," "professional," "moderate," "polite," "tactful", "correct." Moreover, this estimate is almost equally present in surveys of staff members who revealed violations, and those who have no violations were detected. Negative myth that all government inspectors and auditors' corrupt and corrupt, has no relation to staff Rosfinnadzor, although individual guidance for signs of corruption to occur. About a third of respondents believe that the inspectors Rosfinnadzor much less corrupt than police officers or tax service. Estimated corruption Rosfinnadzor looks much more attractive "sister" of supervisory government agencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment