Outdoor reform will raise the price of land?

Market experts have tried to predict how events will develop after the entry into force of the reform of the villa. Recall that even before the bank.ru wrote about the new Ministry of Regional Development Bill, prohibiting the construction of villas on agricultural lands and lands outside the boundaries of settlements. Thus, the Ministry proposed to divide the plots into three types: gardens, garden and directly chalet. In the first two cases on sections can be placed only outbuildings, but not residential. That's the rub, for the moment ogoromnoe number of cottages built on agricultural lands, and not for private habitation. According to the head of one of the offices of the company "Inkom-real estate" Valery Lukinova if the bill is adopted, developers will have to urgently engage in transfer of land from one category to another, leading to higher prices ares at $ 3-5 thousand, and in fact already in the suburbs price per sq.m. is $ 10-12 thousand Furthermore, Luchino sure that the procedure for transfer of land will take at least two years, "when signing the bill can be expected appreciation of the land by almost 50% and a significant delay in time to complete projects." Another expert, CEO of Beautiful Land "Ilya Sapunov, told RIA Novosti - Real Estate," which in his view, the bill has many flaws. So, it turns out that "if building a house on the site was begun before January 1, 2011 (entry into force of Act), the house is not covered under the law and not prohibited." Talking about it and Lukin. Specialist Inkom-real estate, notes that most problems arise for those people who has been under construction and still in the process of registration documents. But the development director MOZAIK Development Dmitry Makarov sure, the emergence of such a project in one form or another all been waiting for, though he again needed to be expanded. Thinks so and Sapunov, pointing out that the bill states that in the garden area can be placed only farm buildings and structures not intended for the residence of citizens but, meanwhile, "the law is a clear distinction between the buildings, designed and intended to stay. "